LONDON, UK: In the riveting pages of Omid Scobie's latest bombshell, 'Endgame', the royal family's facade crumbles, revealing a tumultuous landscape of betrayal, power struggles, and strained bonds. Unleashing a barrage of revelations, Scobie, a trusted confidant of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, thrusts readers into the heart of the monarchy's most guarded secrets.

From the chilling allegations against 'cold' Kate Middleton to the clandestine letters exposing shocking comments about Archie's skin color, 'Endgame' is a relentless expose on the royal saga. Join us on a journey through 15 explosive revelations, each page a detonation of truth that echoes through the hallowed halls of Buckingham Palace.

'Cold' Kate 'ignored Meghan's cries for help'

Omid Scobie launches a no-holds-barred assault on the Princess of Wales, depicting her as "cold" and accusing her of championing mental health causes while turning a blind eye to Meghan Markle's pleas for help. Dubbed Prince Harry and Meghan's "cheerleader-in-chief," Scobie takes a jab at Kate, claiming she "shivers" at Meghan's name and hasn't spoken to her since 2019.

In a scathing revelation, Scobie portrays Kate as one who "glides under the radar" by avoiding public struggles, branding her "comfortable in her role" while condemning the institution for ignoring Meghan's pain.

Letters expose who 'commented on Archie's skin color'

Scobie claims letters exchanged between King Charles III and Meghan reveal the identities of two individuals who allegedly commented on Archie's skin color, adding another layer to the 'royal racist' row. Despite his knowledge, Scobie refrains from disclosing the names, citing potential legal consequences in the UK.

In an ABC interview, he revealed the exchange of letters between Charles and Meghan after the bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey in March 2021. "We know from sources that Charles was horrified that that's how Meghan felt. Those conversations were, and that he wanted to, sort of as a representative for the family, have that conversation with her," he said.

Prince William alleged press leaks damaged brotherly bond

The book alleges that Prince William leaked "private information" about Prince Harry to the press, causing "irreparable damage" to their relationship, portraying William as a 'company man' and a staunch defender of the royal institution.

However, allies of King Charles vehemently deny these claims, asserting that such actions are contrary to William's personal principles. They emphasize William's commitment to maintaining family privacy, highlighting his reluctance to repeat the history of his parents' tumultuous relationship, known as the "war of the Waleses." "That was something that he and Harry were meant to be united on," the source added.

Prince William's role in stripping Andrew of his royal duties

Scobie contends that Prince William played a pivotal role in stripping Prince Andrew of his royal duties, asserting that the Duke of Cambridge initiated the move to protect the monarchy from the shadow cast by Andrew's association with Jeffrey Epstein. In the absence of Prince Philip, who traditionally played a decisive role, William, with the support of his private secretary, orchestrated a meeting with Queen Elizabeth at Windsor to address what he referred to as "the Andrew problem."

The author claims that after an hour-long conversation with Prince William, the Queen contacted Charles in Scotland, conveying the need to strip Andrew of his titles and duties. Scobie describes the moment as "genuinely sad" for the Queen and a "gut punch" for the family, especially following Prince Philip's passing.

Frogmore Cottage eviction was 'cheap shot' to 'punish' Harry and Megan for Netflix series

King Charles' decision to evict Prince Harry and Meghan from Frogmore Cottage is depicted as a 'cheap shot' and a form of punishment, with sources claiming it was in response to the couple's Netflix series, released in December, attacking the royal family.

The Sussexes were reportedly shocked and disappointed by the eviction, considering Frogmore their only secure option in the UK. Scobie claims, "It was also part of the effort to streamline the portfolio of properties being used by members of the family." The author suggests this action "was a cheap shot from a wounded father bound by an institutional system that is often intolerant of human emotion."

Princess Michael of Kent criticized Meghan for making 'it all about race'

As per the latest revelations, the Duchess of Sussex faces fresh scrutiny as Princess Michael of Kent is claimed to have suggested Meghan had "made it all about race because that's all everyone does these days," following her bombshell Oprah Winfrey interview. According to Scobie, during a March 2021 meeting at her Kensington Palace apartment, Princess Michael engaged in gossip with an aide, expressing her lack of admiration for Meghan.

The author contends that the 78-year-old royal "has never been much of a fan of Prince Harry's wife." Princess Michael previously faced criticism in 2017 for wearing a 'blackamoor' brooch to the Queen's Christmas lunch attended by Meghan. The move was deemed by some as racially insensitive, for which she publicly apologized.

King Charles' leadership style clashes with Prince William's vision

The book suggests a clash in leadership styles between King Charles and Prince William, with the latter reportedly viewing his father as "not competent enough" and aligning more with the assertiveness inherited from Prince Philip.

The Prince of Wales, portrayed as more deliberative, reportedly spent sleepless nights agonizing over decisions, notably concerning Prince Andrew and the Epstein scandal. In contrast, William, described as decisive, was "baffled" by his father's hesitance and sought swift action. The book hints, "While King Charles has, so far, shown no inclination of conclusively stopping his support for his wayward brother, Andrew would be foolish to think that William will unquestionably support his uncle in the same way."

"It's fair to say, the next King is the one in the family who inherited Prince Philip's assertiveness when it comes to protecting the Crown. Until then, though, Andrew remains a wild card and one that can still inflict considerable damage to the monarchy," writes Scobie.

'Pampered' King Charles' lavish habits

Scobie portrays King Charles as a "pampered" royal, detailing alleged habits like having shoelaces ironed and receiving assistance in squeezing toothpaste onto his toothbrush. He also claims Charles travels with opulent 1,000-thread-count bed linen.

The author alleges that Charles' meticulous demands extend to having fresh, ironed shoelaces whenever the slightest wear is noticed. However, palace sources have vehemently refuted these claims, labeling them as "total bull****" and asserting that several allegations in Scobie's book are "just plain wrong" and "rehashed."

King Charles' 'cold and brief' response to Harry's memoir

Prince Harry's attempt to discuss his grievances with King Charles following the release of his memoir 'Spare' reportedly resulted in an "awkward" and "cold" conversation, highlighting the persistent strains in their relationship.

Despite encouragement from a friend, Harry reached out to Charles only after months of apparent distance between them, hoping to address unresolved issues. The lack of a "significant resolution or outcome" from this conversation is portrayed as another missed opportunity for Charles to "take the upper hand and let bygones be bygones for the sake of family harmony."

Prince Harry and Meghan 'still hurt' over children's title delay

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex continue to harbor feelings of hurt over the delay in updating their children's titles, according to Scobie. Despite the couple's reported contentment in California, the author claims they remain scarred by the fact that it took six months for Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet to be officially recognized as "prince" and "princess" on the Buckingham Palace website after King Charles ascended the throne.

The book suggests that while the royal convention dictates an automatic update, Charles initially avoided the subject, only promising to "make it official" in early 2023. The delay reportedly prompted the Sussexes to draw comparisons to the treatment of Prince William and Kate's children, leaving them feeling uneasy about the perceived differences.

Meghan's intention to avoid England and 'royal soap opera'

Scobie repeats claims that Meghan has no intention of returning to England, expressing discomfort with the 'royal soap opera' and asserting that she "never felt at home" in the UK. The author suggests that Meghan's absence during her son Archie's fourth birthday, coinciding with the coronation, was deliberate.

While Prince Harry traveled to the UK, Meghan opted to stay in California, citing concerns over security and potential public backlash. Scobie claims in his book that Meghan refused to attend, expressing her unwillingness to "dive back into the soap opera of the court."

Prince William ignored Harry's texts in the hours before Queen's death

Prince William ignored text messages from Prince Harry, who was desperately trying to reach Balmoral to be with their grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, in her final moments. The book alleges that, despite available seats on William's private jet, Harry was left to make his own arrangements, feeling "completely by himself."

This revelation adds to the previous account in Harry's memoir, 'Spare', where he expressed frustration at William's lack of response during the family's rush to be with the Queen on September 8, 2022. "I immediately texted Willy to ask whether he and Kate were flying up. If so, when? And how?. No response. Meg and I looked at flight options," wrote the Duke of Sussex.

Queen Camilla thanked Piers Morgan for 'defending the firm' after Oprah interview

Scobie claims Queen Camilla sent a message of gratitude to Piers Morgan for "defending The Firm" amid Meghan's accusations, highlighting the complexity of relationships within the royal family.

The controversial British journalist was praised by the King's wife for "standing up" to Meghan amid the Sussexes' highly publicized criticisms of the monarchy during their interview with Oprah.

Kate and Meghan were encouraged to 'cosplay' as Princess Diana

The book asserts that both Kate and Meghan were encouraged to emulate Princess Diana's style, with alleged suggestions and efforts to have them 'cosplay' as the beloved late princess. "During the past thirteen years, Diana cosplay has become a royal staple," he writes.

"Were there gentle pushes from others? At times, yes. It had been known for someone to go back and pull images of Diana at a certain place or time for ideas. At the right moment this can be a sweet gesture, but there is also a slightly queasy feeling when you realise it's often orchestrated within the same system that contributed to her living misery, and an institution that still wants some of Diana's shine to rub off on them," 'Endgame' states.

Queen Camilla has 'no relationship' with Prince Harry

Despite Queen Camilla's "great sympathy" for Meghan, Scobie claims she has "no relationship" with Prince Harry. A royal source emphasized that she has "no respect for the way they handled themselves."

In contrast, Camilla and King Charles are said to enjoy jovial lunches with Prince William and Kate. The book notes that William and Harry took time to develop a relationship with Camilla, but as with the public, William has grown closer to his stepmother over the years, especially since the Sussexes' departure.

The author is set to release 'Endgame' on Tuesday, November 28, in Britain.