LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: Britney Spears’ children are not keen to see their mother before leaving the city! As per a source, Sean Preston and Jayden James will be moving with their father Kevin Federline to Hawaii from California and have no plans to meet the ‘Circus’ crooner before they leave. It is reported that Britney Spears hasn't seen her boys for over a year now and the two were also missing from her wedding to Sam Asghari in 2022. Her attorney Matthew Rosengart earlier wrote a letter announcing that the pop diva will not object to their move. “To her credit, Britney Spears will not interfere with and consents to the relocation,” it read.

The letter was a reply to Federline’s lawyer, Mark Vincent Kaplan, who criticized the DJ for taking issues in public, instead of handling privately. “I was particularly concerned because your client previously — and appallingly — violated their privacy, while egregiously violating Britney’s privacy, by releasing a private video of Britney with her children, which was preceded by a tabloid television interview.” His reference was to footage of Spears’ heated exchange with their sons and Federline’s revealing ITV appearance in 2022.

Why Britney Spears' sons didn't want to see her?

Britney Spears' children haven’t seen their mother in over a year, and that tells that all is not well between them. The older son Preston turned 18, and his younger brother, James, 16, are close to making their own choices. Thus, lacking connection with the pop diva, who last year married Sam Asghari, there is a huge gap between the mother and children. Federline, 45, and Victoria Prince are planning to rent a place in Hawaii after the latter got a job offer in the Aloha State. They will of course look for a permanent house later too.

'Did nothing to shelter them'

The DJ is also father to daughter Kori, 21, and son Kaleb, 19, with his ex-fiancee Shar Jackson as well as daughters Jordan, 11, and Peyton, nine, with Prince, whom he married in August 2013.

Britney Spears’ lawyer also commented on Federline’s claim of protecting their children from the unnecessary spotlight. “It was also ironic [that you said] the children wanted to be ‘more sheltered from the media’s scrutiny.’ That is commendable. But [Federline’s] media interview did nothing to shelter them; instead, it publicized the issue in the media," reports PageSix.